Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Megami Tensei monsters, bosses, and creatures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

List of Megami Tensei monsters, bosses, and creatures

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This list is pure trivia and game guide material. The overall fact that the enemies are based off of other fictional elements and the like is important (if sourced correctly), but the actual instances are not. TTN (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unencyclopedic in presentation and scope, and constitutes original research (or at least, excessive reliance on primary material) for the most part. Could be replaced by the line "many creatures in Megami Tensei have mythical antecedents". Protonk (talk) 20:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — Contains nothing but WP:GAMEGUIDE information as well as being heavily-laden with original (primary) research. MuZemike (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Far too excessive detail. It's like saying "The items in Disgaea frequently have humorous descriptions or other accompanying texts" and then the going on to post every, single, one. Nifboy (talk) 23:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * excessive details? its just a list of the items, not a description of them. DGG (talk) 04:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete: For failing WP:NOT and WP:VGSCOPE, in addition to lacking the reliable third-party sources to meet its research WP:BURDEN. Completely inappropriate for Wikipedia. Randomran (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.