Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miss Exotic World Pageant participants and winners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

List of Miss Exotic World Pageant participants and winners

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Failed to meet WP:GNG. The topic did not receive significant coverage in reliable sources. Richie Campbell (talk) 18:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Ive just added some significant citations. I donot think this article needs to be deleted now. 27.60.143.161 (talk) 19:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Doesn't appear to be a notable pageant. Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a WP:SPINOUT of Miss Exotic World Pageant, which has also been nominated for deletion.  I agree that, if the "parent" article is deleted, then there is little justification for having the instant article.  But the deletion discussion there seems to be headed for a "keep", and so WP:SPINOUT is sufficient justification for keeping this list article.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Even if that one is kept, I don't think a list of participants and winners is automatically notable. WP:NOTINHERITED. Ajf773 (talk) 20:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * But the rules of WP:SPINOUT do not require that the list be independently notable. They require only that the material be too large to fit within the parent article, and that the spinout be done in some logical fashion.  Spinning out a list of winners is both logical and acceptable (e.g. List of Pulitzer Prize winners).  NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Listcruft. This doesn't even belong in the article on the parent. None of the people listed is notable beyond participating in this obscure pageant. --Randykitty (talk) 15:06, 29 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.