Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miss Universe editions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Not gonna lie even I'm a tad confused on the "fancruft" part but whatever, Consensus is to Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Miss Universe editions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unsourced fancruft The Banner talk 08:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Huh? It's just a list of the individual pageants; I don't see how that's "fancruft". And I don't see how the dates and venues wouldn't be verifiable, so the present sourcing is irrelevant. postdlf (talk) 01:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - not fancruft in the least. —Мандичка YO 😜 04:19, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Do something with it This is not really a "list" as WP usually uses the word, since the items do not seem to have their own articles -- or they are not linked.  I suggest renaming to Miss Universe locations or merging to Miss Universe as a new section where it would not be out of place.  My bad. I see the dates are linked to articles on the individual contests. I don't see any policy problem then. Merging to Miss Universe is also an option.  ''Borock (talk) 04:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep it's a well-defined, useful list of amnageable size, notable subject, all entries are blue-linked, and pertinent information is presented, passes WP:SALAT Kraxler (talk) 02:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.