Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miss World editions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Miss World editions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unsourced fancruft The Banner talk 08:03, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, meritless autopilot nomination just as with Articles for deletion/List of Miss Universe editions. This is nothing but an index list of the individual pageants, all of which have articles, with annotations for dates, venues, and the number of competitors. Really basic facts, not "fancruft". postdlf (talk) 01:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I love your bad faith about this nomination that sounds rather pointy. Perhaps I should not have named it fancruft but WP:LISTCRUFT. The Banner talk 09:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I can only judge your nomination on what you've written, which is not much at all here, and nothing that actually shows consideration of this list's specific content. You've nominated a whole host of pageant related articles recently, many of which have merited deletion because the pageants themselves are not notable or the information is trivial. But this one is easily distinguishable as I have explained. And no, swapping "listcruft" for "fancruft" would not make your nomination any more substantive or less of a WP:VAGUEWAVE. postdlf (talk) 14:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  15:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep it's a well-defined, useful list of a manageable size, notable subject, all entries are blue-linked, and pertinent information is presented, passes WP:SALAT Kraxler (talk) 02:06, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The pageant itself is notable and this list is just giving details. WP:I don't like it very much. I'd rather see it put at the bottom of Miss World than have its own page.  But deletion does not seem justified by any WP policy. Borock (talk) 04:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Basic index of the pageant's editions, and no true reason presented for deletion.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.