Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED factions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED factions

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This list violates our policy on fictional content, as it is plot only coverage. The political factions within Mobile Suit Gundam SEED is not an encyclopaedic topic as there is no significant secondary coverage in reliable sources about it, resulting it in failing the general notability guideline. Anthem 09:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, thus failing WP:N. Edison (talk) 02:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect with a consideration to merge content to Mobile Suit Gundam SEED and Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Destiny. —Farix (t &#124; c) 01:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect Mobile Suit Gundam SEED factions to Mobile Suit Gundam SEED and Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Destiny, I doubt the average reader will use List of when it comes to this. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:22, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete without significant coverage in reliable independent sources, there's no neutral way to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No out-of-universe context or notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:OR. --Crusio (talk) 14:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are no reliable third-party sources to presume that Wikipedia should have an article about the fictional factions. The topic of the list does not meet the criteria of general notability guideline and the list has not been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, failing the criteria of notability for stand-alone lists as well. The subject can only be covered as a plot-only description of a fictional work because it has no reception and significance in reliable third-party sources. Since the subject falls into what Wikipedia is not, it also fails the criteria of appropriate topics for lists. There is nothing valuable to keep since the article seems to rely on primary sources and original research by synthesis to generate the content. The article title is an implausible search term, so I do not believe that a redirect is an acceptable outcome. Jfgslo (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.