Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Model United Nations conferences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination due to the low participation. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:33, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

List of Model United Nations conferences

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a list of club events, none of which is independently notable. WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE applies here. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as a redirect target, if anything. I don't think it fails WP:LIST as indiscriminate.  Also, while each Model UN may be NN, the concept of such conferences, and the circuit of clubs, are inded notable, as shown by many citations in article already. Bearian (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment There is already an article about the Model United Nations. As a general concept, it is quite notable.  However, the list of individual branches seems excessively trivial.  The many citations in the article are merely links to each individual club's website.  That does not confer notability to any of the individual clubs.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 11:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 00:15, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.