Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Morphers in Power Rangers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

List of Morphers in Power Rangers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources to verify subject. I know it is notable, but it is not notable anywhere independent of the fiction. Also, this probably falls under WP:NOT, but I'm not exactly sure. — Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 09:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRUFT. If page is deleted pls make sure that the link is removed from the Power Rangers navbox. KuyaBriBri Talk 14:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as having little to no real-world notability. Stifle (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge content into appropriate main articles (sub-series of Power Rangers). JPG-GR (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge per JPG-GR. Information is interesting and notable  within the context of the series , but it has absolutely no real world notability, so these things definitely deserve mention, but not their own article.  I'd say make a new section in each of the series articles for mention of the morphers.  Grandmartin11 (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral. I didn't see any sources on the page, but I don't think I've ever seen so much detail on a page that looked like it needed to be deleted.  Would there be anyway to merge this article with another page or pages and still keep the pertinent information?  Chicken Wing (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No, you would not be able to merge and keep the information at the same time. — Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 20:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRUFT. There is already enough info on the morphers in the respective series articles. --Numyht (talk) 12:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.