Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Muslims in business (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 09:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

List of Muslims in business
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:LISTCRUFT. Störm  (talk)  09:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk</b>) 09:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. For countries with significant Muslim majorities, this amounts to just a random list of businesspeople and is of no value. There is possibly some interest in having a list of Muslims in business in countries where this is unusual (though even this is doubtful). If such a list were to be created we would need solid evidence that everyone included was in fact a Muslim by self-identification and not just by heritage. For example there’s nothing to support the inclusion of Zaha Hadid in this list. Mccapra (talk) 10:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. What's next, a list of left-handed civil engineers? Agree with WP:LISTCRUFT. Simon Wright (talk) 13:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Overly broad article; with a fifth of the world's population being Muslim there is little keeping this from being an indiscriminate list. This is virtually all business people from many countries and it is not worth listing in this fashion. Reywas92Talk 23:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough solid sources backing inclusion and no strong evidence this is looked at as a cohesive group.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.