Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NASA contractors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

List of NASA contractors

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article documents a 2009 report - no longer current and perhaps never even necessary in the first place. askeuhd (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. askeuhd (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Fixed the issue. Washing Machine (alt) (talk) 13:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment, if the spirit of AfD is that we should try to improve rather than delete, then there are sources that would enable that:
 * 1) https://www.osbp.nasa.gov/docs/top20_2020_contractors-TAGGED.pdf
 * 2) https://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/about/people/contractorlist.html
 * 3) https://www.statista.com/statistics/445838/ranking-of-the-biggest-us-dod-contractors/  CT55555 (talk) 14:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * the spirit of the AfD from my perspective was that even probably sourced and updated, the article would be little more than a billboard for the listed contractors. However, this could very well be due to lack of imagination on my part. --askeuhd (talk) 16:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. I find that a credible perspective. I avoided commenting on that, because I don't understand the purpose of the article, which is why I just commented on the "no longer current" part of it. CT55555 (talk) 16:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Trivial for encyclopedia. --Yoonadue (talk) 17:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This content is not Encyclopedic. --Alan Islas (talk) 05:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.