Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NCAA football teams with 900 wins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect seems superfluous as anybody doing the (rather unlikely) search for "List of NCAA football teams with 900 wins" will easily find List of NCAA football teams by wins. Randykitty (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

List of NCAA football teams with 900 wins

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST and is simply a subset of the more comprehensive List of NCAA football teams by wins. Cbl62 (talk) 15:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, American football,  and Lists. Skynxnex (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is based on an arbitrary cut point without significance demonstrated by sourcing. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of NCAA football teams by wins This is an artifact of a time before we had sortable tables to drill down said 900+ win information, so it's now duplicative of the mentioned article, but I do find it to be a proper plausible redirect (and I'd suggest a List of NCAA football teams with 1,000 wins redirect can be created down the line).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect is a reasonable ATD. Cbl62 (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Pointless content fork of List of NCAA football teams by wins. 900 as a cut off number seems unusual. Ajf773 (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment As I said above, no team has yet to crack the thousand-win mark, so 900 was appropriate at the time of creation in 2012 because several teams had reached that hallmark, and at the time we didn't have sortable tables which allowed the user to sort by any number they chose. There are plenty of these table articles around that should be merged into others now that sorting is much easier.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect seems to be the right choice here. This should be considered a non-controversial editing choice in my view.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of NCAA football teams by wins as an ATD. Ejgreen77 (talk) 02:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete (oppose redirect) everything in this page is covered List of NCAA football teams by wins and 900 is an arbitrary starting point. Further, “ List of NCAA football teams with 900 wins” is a very unlikely search term.  Frank   Anchor  11:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I oppose redirection. I agree with Frank Archor, this is all included List of NCAA football teams by wins and would be an unlikely search term as it's an arbitrary milestone. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.