Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NHL players who spent their entire career with one franchise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. postdlf (talk) 20:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

List of NHL players who spent their entire career with one franchise

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely arbitrary list, which is not anything recognized either in the NHL itself or in hockey as a wider sport. Ten seasons is not some inherent mark of notability, and there is no reason such a list needs to exist. Kaiser matias (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete long tenures are notable, but the parameters of this list aren't. I found lists of the most famous players to only play with one franchise, but that is editorial in nature.18abruce (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The topic of spending career with one team is a notable topic in the NHL. Therefore it is a valid list. Per the guideline on lists, the individual items in a list don't need to be notable, just the list itself and it is. -DJSasso (talk) 10:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as Djsasso says, this is a valid, notable topic. Lepricavark (talk) 03:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, but with caveats. I agree that the topic of players spending their entire career with one team is notable (at least, I know it is in other sports, and would be surprised if it's not in hockey). My concern at present is a lack of sourcing specifically saying that 10 years is the "right" cutoff point - it's an appreciably long time, sure, but unless there's a general sense among extant sources that spending your career in the one place for a decade rather than 8 years or 12 (for example), then it's an arbitrary number. As a secondary issue - and probably more of a cleanup one than anything else - I'm puzzled by some of the ways the years are listed, in that you have Bob Armstrong (listed second) reading "1950-1951, 1952-1962", which implies a break for some reason, while another name (Bill Barber, both cases selected randomly) reads "1972-1984", implying no break. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - As others have stated, this is a notable topic within hockey at least. I recognize issues around setting a cutoff, but I don't have a problem with 10 as it represents a substantial career and fits the cultural affection for round numbers.  That said, I would have no objection if a discussion results in a consensus that the appropriate cutoff should be 8 years or 12 years or some other non-trivial duration.  But that is an editing issue, not a basis for deletion. Rlendog (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.