Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Naruto Deaths


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

List of Naruto Deaths

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not an appropriate topic for a list. All this list is about is which fictional characters killed which other fictional characters and is nothing more than trivia. This also fails WP:NOT per WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:IINFO. You can call it fancruft if you like as I believe this is a text book example content that is of importance only to a small population of enthusiastic fans. And I doubt that even the enthusiastic fans will find this list all that interesting. —Farix (t &#124; c) 22:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Kill with fire please. The nominators argument is spot on and I can only second it. Screw Capricorne 90MF is even worse. Yoenit (talk) 23:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete this lot of unneeded information (WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:FANCRUFT). Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:47, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that even most (if not all) fans would think that is list unneeded.--70.24.215.48 (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Edward321 (talk) 21:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The deaths can just as easily be talked about in the plot if they are notable, delete also per nom. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:15, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Mostly fancruft; not notable enough for a list. Anything which is notable to the article on Naruto should be incorporated into that article (but even that article does not need a long list of deaths - just the important ones, woven into the prose). ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.