Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nas songs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 04:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

List of Nas songs

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely unnecessary to have an article listing every song of an artist. Song lists should simply be kept in their appropriate album pages. Spellcast 08:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Nas discography. Otto4711 13:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think every song has to be merged into a discography. Song lists belong in their appropriate albums. Spellcast 07:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Nas discography is just that--a discography.  I don't think it makes sense to merge this list there.  From the discography page (or the Nas page for that matter) it's easy to track down any Nas song one wants.  This is not All Music Guide or similar web sites.--Bigtimepeace | talk |  contribs 07:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.  -- Pax:Vobiscum 22:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 21:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. The table is now formatted as a "sortable prettytable"; that is, each column can be sorted alphabetically. Though I feel that this substantially increases its utility, I have no opinion as to its ultimate fate. Perhaps the fact that the list of songs can now be sorted alphabetically and by album partially addresses the opposition to merging it. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 21:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Notwithstanding the recent prettifying by Black Falcon, I don't see any policy reason to keep this page. That said, I don't see any reason to delete it either. Especially since we already have [several lists of Beatles songs (though a paucity of lists for other artists). I'm not sure where to draw the line, so I have difficulty forming an opinion.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] - T 03:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Prettifying? That makes it sound like I added pink bows and white flowers. :-) -- Black Falcon (Talk) 20:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry if it came across as stupid. I think the sortable table is a big improvement. Well done.--Chaser - T 20:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh no, not at all. I actually found it quite funny. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 20:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vassyana 10:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge to Nas discography. A discography is, by definition, a list of songs, so there's no reason to have separate articles on redundant topics.  A good discography will have all this information, and simply have it well-organized.  More use of sortable tables on discography pages (and tables everywhere) is definitely a good thing. --JayHenry 20:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge per JayHenry. GassyGuy 10:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, this content should be covered within the discography/album articles.  I have no problem with the content being merged to such prior to deletion, but this page should not stand as is. -MrFizyx 17:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete useless-who wasted their time doing this?Cosprings 17:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. &mdash; JackLumber /tɔk/ 22:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge as per MrFizyx. -- Futurano 10:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge per JayHenry. There's nothing inherently wrong with a "list of songs by" article, though it may be better suited to the discography article. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 04:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.