Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nepali newspapers in New York


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 01:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

List of Nepali newspapers in New York

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A list article where not a single one of the entries in the list is notable, i.e. has an article here on en-WP, or even is likely to ever get one, "sourced" only to the non-notable entities themselves... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 20:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apart from Tom's points, the article was apparently created by an undisclosed paid editor, see User talk:HariKrishna123. I suppose it's sourced to the non-notable papers themselves, as Tom says; both the footnotes are 404. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC).
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 06:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 06:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 06:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 06:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Because the notability of the newspapers themselves is at best suspect, a list of them holds even less notability - an effect not unlike the multiplication of fractions. I also note that the only two "sources" in the article are both dead links. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This might be worth brief mention in Nepali culture in New York but does not merit a stand alone article. The fact that article does not exist tells us that this is putting the cart before the horse at best. The larger topic article needs to be created first. Weather there are enough reliable sources to create that article I do not know. I have to say that a lot of our article on immigrants groups are very weak and rarely based on sources that have studied the topic in a deep and expansive way.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.