Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nestlé brands


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 04:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

List of Nestlé brands
A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 16:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Nestlé is an incredibly well-known company, with a large number of brands. There is no reason to delete an article that provides this information and putting it in the Nestlé article would be overwhelming. FrozenPurpleCube 16:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or convert to a category. Worthwhile information. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, encyclopedic information about a highly notable company. Which is not to say that every brand listed should necessarily have its own article...but this information belongs here.  Postdlf 16:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. Gazpacho 18:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Useful list.-- Hús  ö  nd  19:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - per above - AfDs are getting ridiculous! PT  ( s-s-s-s ) 20:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - looking at the page history (always recommended before voting delete), we see that the article was created as a spin-off from Nestlé. See the edit summary on the left of this diff. Thus delete is not an option. Carcharoth 00:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge back into Nestle. Carcharoth 00:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per the comments above, this is a valid and notable list. RFerreira 01:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just remember to brush your teeth after!  Grindingteeth 15:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.