Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Neutrogena spokesmodels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Neutrogena. v/r - TP 14:25, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

List of Neutrogena spokesmodels

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced, non-notable arbitrary cruft list. Ukraine Calling (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely unsourced and unlikely to have any independent sources. Any notable spokesmodeling should be present at Neutrogena or at each respective spokesmodel's page anyway. §everal⇒|Times 15:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, that guess seems to be incorrect. The article now does reflect independent sourcing (for some, though not all, of the material).--Epeefleche (talk) 23:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * In that case I rescind my vote. I mean, I still don't think it's a keep or anything. §everal⇒|Times 23:32, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * merge to Neutrogena. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:55, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as indiscriminate info. Nothing substantial to merge. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 02:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - I found and added these sources as inline citations in the article:
 * (February 10, 2009.)"EXCLUSIVE: Emma Roberts Named Neutrogena Brand Ambassador." People Magazine.
 * (February 11, 2010.) "EXCLUSIVE: Miranda Cosgrove is Neutrogena’s Newest Face!." People Magazine.
 * (January 30, 2009.) "{Natascha McElhone Is The New Neutrogena Spokes Model." Starpulse.com.
 * The people in the list appear to have been reported upon per WP:NLIST guidelines, and the list conforms to WP:LISTPEOPLE in the Manual of Style for stand-alone lists. Northamerica1000 (talk) 23:26, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ...then Merge - To Neutrogena article. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge: to Neutrogena; the main article is none too substantial, and I'm unsure why anyone thought a spinoff list was necessary.  Ravenswing  11:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Reliable sources do cover who the spokesmodels are as a quick Google news archive check confirms. McElhone is new Neutrogena spokesmodel Daily Express, Kristen Bell is New Face of Neutrogena WTTG.    D r e a m Focus  14:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. A list of people paid to appear in commercials for a particular commercial product lacks encyclopedic value, except perhaps in unusual circumstances which must be supported by reliably sourced text. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sources have been found, there even headlines in major newspapers announcing when some famous model is made a Neutrogena spokesmodel.  D r e a m Focus  00:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - A famous person being named a spokesperson for the company does not mean that they are notable collectively. This is trivia, nothing more. Tarc (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Some of the names have references found already announcing them being made into spokesmodels. So the list is notable.  And not every entry on the list need be sourced.   D r e a m Focus  00:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Irrelevant; as it may make the individuals notable, but not notable collectively. I don't really expect the ARS keep-everythingers to appreciate the distinction, though. Tarc (talk) 01:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge per Ravenswing. The content is significant as it reflects on Neutrogena's public identity; but no real need for a separate article.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.