Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New South Wales Rural Fire Service brigades (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

List of New South Wales Rural Fire Service brigades
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Still fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY as none of the brigades are notable on their own. This is just a collection of outdated website links. Since its nomination in 2015 it has essentially been expanded to include a whole heap of poorly sourced fancruft involving numbers of types of appliances and firefighting equipment in each. Ajf773 (talk) 09:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Australia, Lists,  and Organizations. Ajf773 (talk) 09:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not disputing the nomination, but wanted to point out "fancruft" is not a valid deletion rationale - it is someone's essay. Deus et lex (talk) 11:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Fancruft is another way to explaining that the article's content is unencyclopedic, the nomination is based on the policy NOTDIRECTORY. Ajf773 (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. This article seems to be sourced largely to sources which are non-independent (i.e. the Rural Fire Service's own websites) and out of date (archived more than a decade ago, which is not appropriate for reporting the equipment owned by each brigade). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOTDIR. LibStar (talk) 02:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.