Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Newspapers that reprinted Charlie Hebdo issue No. 1178


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:25, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

List of Newspapers that reprinted Charlie Hebdo issue No. 1178

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not see the necessity of such a page. It is just a needless list of newspapers that can certainly just be merged with another related article, at best. Libertarian12111971 (talk) 07:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as really, really trivial. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a trivial list. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 14:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom —Мандичка YO 😜 15:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep/Merge Similar in concept to this article List of newspapers that reprinted Jyllands-Posten's Muhammad cartoons . Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 15:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Extremely trivial and not needed. CitiV (talk) 01:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Neutral Like Chris  said, this seems similar and of equal magnitude to the Posten cartoon incident. Do what is best, but I thought I would explain my reasoning for creating the page. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 01:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I wouldn't say so much that they re-printed issue 1178, but that they showed the cover, in some cases as an illustration for an article, which is pretty common when reporting on something that was published. LaMona (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per everyone else. 75.80.160.109 (talk) 18:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.