Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nintendo 3DS colors and styles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

List of Nintendo 3DS colors and styles

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Extremely trivial, mundane, and anal-retentive gamecruft and listcruft. Dronebogus (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Seems to be clear WP:CRUFT. Spf121188 (talk) 16:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete on top of what was mentioned we also have a precedence at Articles for deletion/List of Nintendo Wii colors and styles.--65.93.195.118 (talk) 22:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTCATALOG. Neo-corelight (Talk) 23:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: per NOTCATALOG. DocFreeman24 (talk) 00:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge with the parent article (which provides the ‘contextual information’). The existence of this list would likely not survive in isolation; in cases such as this it does help to keep many details out of the parent article, thus making that article more manageable. (Since the main namespace doesn’t allow subpages, we end up with these strange results.) Jim Grisham (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.