Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nintendo Power covers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Krimpet (talk) 03:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

List of Nintendo Power covers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A list of covers is just fancruft that isn't encyclopedic. Put this on a Nintendo Wiki of some sort, it certainly isn't suitable for Wikipedia itself. RobJ1981 04:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC) -As a note: this user has only 1 other edit (as of now) outside of this AFD. RobJ1981 19:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC) --As an added note, his reasoning was terrible. "Speedy keep because it's fun and I love it!!!" pretty much. - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As much as I love nintendo power this isn't encylopedic and could never expand past a picture gallery. DBZROCKS 12:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There is no picture gallery, and can't be, since that would violate Wikipedia's fair use policy. *** Crotalus ***  01:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.  -- Pax:Vobiscum 16:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Certainly not encyclopedic. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions.   -- Black Falcon (Talk) 21:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, because I loved Nintendo Power, the article is certainly encyclopedic, and picture gallerys are fun and enjoyable to look at. --172.133.4.245 15:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There is no picture gallery, and can't be, since that would violate Wikipedia's fair use policy. *** Crotalus ***  01:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There is no picture gallery, and can't be, since that would violate Wikipedia's fair use policy. *** Crotalus ***  01:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't think there is a speedy keep.
 * Yes there is but this doesn't qualify. Otto4711 00:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep: Lots of the magazines here have a list of covers. This certainly needs a cleanup. It gives a good reference, a good listing and links to games, and all-around, a good article to keep. You WILL be hearing from me if this deleted. TheListUpdater 23:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not a very good way to come off as: "If a majority of people disagree with me, I will make a big deal over it and fight them!" - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a directory of things on the cover of a game magazine. Otto4711 00:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fancruft. Wikipedia is not a dump for random lists.  Coren 00:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Supports the main article with historic data enough to be valid in my opinion. To much info to fit on the main article page. I do not blieve WP:NOT holds up, and 'fancruft' is not a valid reason to delete--Dacium 01:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable secondary sources (or any sources at all, as far as I can see); full of trivia. *** Crotalus ***  01:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete seriously, this is about as trivial as it gets. JuJube 02:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Important and famous magazine for one of the most successful and still ongoing video game companies in human history. --172.129.74.92 02:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Above anonymous user has voted "Speedy Keep" in a slew of AfD. His votes should be ignored as bad faith and disruption. JuJube 02:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.