Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of One Piece pirate crews


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

List of One Piece pirate crews

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

List is merely a directory with a few plot summaries. It is almoast completely redundant to List of One Piece characters, List of minor One Piece characters, and recently deleted List of One Piece filler characters. It has no lead. It is completely unsourced. And it is written from an in-universe perspective, for example listing characters, who die during the course of the story, as "Deceased". -- Goodraise (talk) 06:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as the nom said, completely redundant. JuJube (talk) 11:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of context, sources, separate notability. Bit worried about the suggestion that we can delete an article because it's "redundant with the recently deleted..." something, though!!! AndyJones (talk) 09:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If that article had been deleted because of being redundant to this one, then I'd agree. Perhaps I should have pointed out, that it was deleted for complete lack of notablity. -- Goodraise (talk) 10:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Come off it. Something cannot be redundant with something else which we don't have. AndyJones (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If you need to make this technical, please. I was trying to explain, why we don't need this article, not insisting that it is redundant to List of One Piece filler characters. I'll reword it for you: It is largely redundant to List of One Piece characters and List of minor One Piece characters. Almoast everything else was covered in List of One Piece filler characters, which was deleted, because it's content (and therefore the portion of this articles, which was redundant to it) was not notable. Happy now? -- Goodraise (talk) 10:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.