Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Otherworld Characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  19:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

List of Otherworld Characters

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a list of characters included in a non-notable anime fanfiction series. It fails to satisfy standards such as WP:N, WP:RS, WP:NOR and WP:NOT, and is unencyclopaedic. Wikipedia should not have articles on every character from every non-notable fanfiction series created by you and your friends at school. Mizu onna sango15 / 水 女 珊瑚15  22:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This is about a fanfic - why wasn't it speedied?  Obvious conflict of interest, if the author really wants to promote their fanfic, there are numerous fanfic sites online.  Edward321 (talk) 23:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply 'Confilct of interest' is not a criterion. This might qualify as advertising, but not quite blatant spam, per se, and thus it would be controversial to speedy delete it as such. -- Mizu onna sango15 / 水 女 珊瑚15  07:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Present article isnt worth keeping. DGG (talk) 22:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, although "List of characters" are usually a compromise between total deletion and a page for every character, these aren't characters from a TV show at all. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 05:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This is abandoned sandbox quality, nothing more. If there is ever a proper article about this topic, it should start off a little more decent. – sgeureka t•c 08:15, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.