Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Paramount Pictures films (1970–1979)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 20:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

List of Paramount Pictures films (1970–1979)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't find sources to add to show it meets WP:NLIST / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Lists.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Obviously a split of Lists of Paramount Pictures films. No particular issue with those lists. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  21:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, echoing Mushy Yank. Unclear why you are nominating this one in particular of the decade lists. Reywas92Talk 22:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are many sources on the history and films of the Paramount Studio, see Mountain of Dreams: The Golden Years of Paramount Pictures, The Paramount Story, Engulfed: The Death of Paramount Pictures and the Birth of Corporate Hollywood, and more. The current state of sourcing in the article is not relevant for notability; that can be fixed by editing. Keep per WP:NEXIST. Toughpigs (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete One-sourced article and better covered by Category:Paramount Pictures films and 'films by year' and films by year' genre cats. Nomination is pretty clear to build consensus for future deletions of 'list of studio's film by decade' articles, which are all covered and duplicated by each "(year) in (nation) film" articles that have much better sourcing and don't have to deal with 'studio stan' editors.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep as a valid split from the main article and in view of the reliable book sources identified by Toughpigs in this discussion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a valid list article. All information can be found in the articles linked to. If you want to copy the references over for some reason you can, but its not needed for lists.  D r e a m Focus  13:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Another "Candidate for deletion" that is too helpful to be one. That Article Editing Guy (talk) 21:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.