Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Philippine Presidents by number of votes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Buck  ets  ofg 00:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

List of Philippine Presidents by number of votes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article duplicates List of Philippine Presidential elections while containing less information. Moreover, it lists presidents in terms of the raw # of votes received and is therefore biased toward more recent times (a larger population). Finally, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information--election results are good, but a list of 14 individuals by vote count is unnecessary. Black Falcon 05:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This list is redundant, and as pointed out by Black Falcon, is not useful because of population growth. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  05:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not necessary - info can be merged into existing articles.  Philippe Beaudette 05:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - not a good day for Philippine presidential lists... Otto4711 06:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, illogical/meaningless ranking criteria. --Dhartung | Talk 07:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment You guys know that we now have a class called "wikitable sortable"? I'd say merge because the original article really needs a compact table. ~ trialsanderrors 08:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant, listcruft. Terence Ong 11:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 12:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; this is indiscriminate and redundant. Trebor 15:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a random collection of information. By number of votes? What's next... list of Presidents by height? Gender? Shrumster 15:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as arbitrary and redundant.-- danntm T C 22:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat 17:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.