Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Philippine public figures who underwent COVID-19 testing (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 13:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

List of Philippine public figures who underwent COVID-19 testing
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Isn't this even worse than a "list of Filipinos with COVID-19"? Did we not delete the master list? And we're going to list people who tested negative, too? And we're listing non-notable people, people with no articles? Elizium23 (talk) 06:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Elizium23 (talk) 06:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Aren't you a little quick on the draw with the nomination for deletion? This just finished discussion and the consensus was keep and reframe just yesterday. And no, the people listed are notable figures, they just don't have articles yet. Please refer to the previous discussion I just linked. -Object404 (talk) 06:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * *Speedy keep -Object404 (talk) 14:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, We don't need plain listing of every politician (and their relatives) who got tested. However, there was consensus from the first nomination to rename and change the scope of the article to focus on the issue itself about the prioritization of politicians and their relatives.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. The previous AfD discussion barely closed 24 hours ago. -seav (talk) 07:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment You were not here during the first discussion. Seriously, you should have read that first in the talk page before nominating it for the second time.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 07:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:43, 5 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy move to 2020 Philippine coronavirus testing controversy. The article is innately WP:INDISCRIMINATE in its current form. I cant believe it survived the first discussion as a "list of officials who underwent testing" can not simply be a valid topic in WP as the other lists before it have been removed too. And without reading its content, THERE REALLY IS SOMETHING WRONG with the title. Drop this AfD and initiate the consensus to reframe the article, or better yet as i suggested, a WP:TNT to the valid controversy article. Title is not worth keeping, seriously.--RioHondo (talk) 09:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: It was agreed in the previous AfD that the article is kept. Hence, it's pointless to nominate it again for deletion since there's an ongoing discussion that the article should be renamed. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 02:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator, due to rename and re-scope which will hopefully eliminate the need for a list of names therein. Elizium23 (talk) 07:39, 6 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.