Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pink Floyd tribute bands


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

List of Pink Floyd tribute bands

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Two notable bands? This list is pointless, or premature at best (and that's being generous. TheJazzDalek (talk) 11:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —TheJazzDalek (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 12:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnecessary page, no need to have spun this off from tribute act, which has a list that use to include these two bands, but now has "→ See List of Pink Floyd tribute bands" in that spot. Articles like this are not at all helpful to the articles about the tribute bands themselves.  Mandsford (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. agreed. The page is unneccesary, gives no information about the bands that cannot be found elsewhere and attracts a lot of non notable names to the list if you look at the history of the page --Godfinger (talk) 13:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This doesn't even need an explanation. Str8cash (talk) 20:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This isn't a Pink Floyd fan site. Mrs. Wolpoff (talk) 16:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 'Tribute act' Mrs. Wolpoff's reason is so bad, a venomous mix of IDL and OTHERSTUFF and trace amounts of other things, I thought I needed to weigh in. Insufficient content at this time to show a need in the foreseeable future for this article's name. However, as the other comments are concerned with the effect it has on 'Tribute act', I think it only prudent to redirect it there. Anarchangel (talk) 04:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.