Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pixar film references (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snow Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

List of Pixar film references
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inherently trivial, fancrufty, original research list. Perfect for a Pixar wiki, but not appropriate for an general-purpose encyclopedia. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  06:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  06:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per all the arguments I made the last time there was an WP:IDONTLIKEIT nomination. We cover what RS'es cover, and these are well and truly covered in secondary, independent, reliable sources. This nomination is problematic in that there's no new argument, policies haven't changed, and the debate was not particularly disputed last time. Jclemens (talk) 06:51, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, because this article has lots of good sources. (Kind of what Jclemens said.) dogman15 (talk) 08:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Jclemens. ö   Brambleberry   of   RiverClan  14:05, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jclemens. If this article is kept, we should probably separate the footnotes that describe where a reference occurs from the actual sources. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable topic. SL93 (talk) 21:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.