Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of PlayStation 4 games released on disc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. An avalanche... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

List of PlayStation 4 games released on disc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very redundant as it includes every game from the main List of PlayStation 4 games page and it only focuses on a trivial thing that is almost never (in 99% of cases) mentioned in the game's article itself. Consensus a while back on the Nintendo Switch games article was to not include this sort of information as a column in these sorts of lists, so it shouldn't exist as a standalone list either. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 01:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - While I agree it should be added to the main list as a column, it has also not been added yet. Until it is actually added, either by you or someone else, I think the list serves some purpose.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:12, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Consensus was to not include this sort of info in these types of lists, as a column or checklist. Are you sure you read me correctly? ~ Dissident93 (talk) 01:16, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think you're following the nomination correctly - your stance suggests going directly against the nom. Sergecross73   msg me  04:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Sorry, misread the nomination. In that case I vote delete per nom.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - We aren't a collector database. TarkusAB talk 02:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 03:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - many past discussions have shown that we don't even want to track this as parts of other lists, let alone stand-alone lists. Not only do they get into WP:NOTGUIDE/WP:NOTCATALOGUE territory, and often a WP:V issue - there's sourcing for all the blockbusters, sure, but in practice, many of the smaller games don't. Sergecross73   msg me  03:59, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 04:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Completely pointless. I understand the posibility of having Network exclusive games, perhaps, as they are games that would not have a classic retail release, but this is silly and fails WP:NOTCATALOGUE  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - If it's that important, why not just tag it in the main list? Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 16:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOTCATALOGUE. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as highly trivial per nom and all above. Similar lists (such as "download only") should also be deleted. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 18:35, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Bit of a snowball at this point, but NOTCATALOGUE, redundant with other lists, etc -- ferret (talk) 18:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. TheDeviantPro (talk) 06:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Ajf773 (talk) 19:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Lepricavark (talk) 14:54, 15 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.