Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Polish military aircraft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. There seems to be some agreement that there's unnecessary duplication between the various articles listing equipment, but no consensus as to which should be the primary article for this list, with at least three different pages proposed here. Discussion on a selective merger should continue on the respective article Talk pages. Owen&times; &#9742;  11:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

List of Polish military aircraft

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This list is unnecessary duplicate of Polish Air Force, List of equipment of the Polish Land Forces and Polish Navy. I don't see any good reason to such duplication, given that duplication is generally discouraged in Wikipedia as duplicate articles is difficult to maintain, and also outlined in WP:DUPLICATE.

Aside of duplication issue. It seems the duplicate article is created to trying to work around the consensus to not put aircraft image into the inventory table which was recently informed to creator of this duplicate article. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Additional note: If the list is only duplicate to either Polish Air Force and List of equipment of the Polish Land Forces, then I would suggest to merge/redirect to one of them per WP:MERGEREASON. Ckfasdf (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Additional note (2): the article is now also duplicate with to Polish Navy, so the lead sentence is revised to reflect this duplicate. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Additional note (3): also tried WP:A10, but was blocked. lead sentence is rewrited to remove duplicate arguments. Ckfasdf (talk) 23:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Transportation, Lists,  and Poland. Skynxnex (talk) 16:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment: If this should be deleted, then be consistent and recommend the deletion of:
 * List of active United States military aircraft
 * List of active Russian military aircraft
 * List of active military aircraft of the French Armed Forces
 * Because individual lists exist for each branch, and then another summary exists. The problem of the list in the other pages is that it lacks details, and people don't want additional details there. At least here, there is more clarity.
 * If the images are a problem, then it should be a problem with
 * List of active United States military aircraft
 * List of active People's Liberation Army aircraft
 * Fabrice Ram (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the information, if it was really a duplicate then it may be on my next to do list. Afeterall, I do have history to remove duplicate table Air Force inventory table in the past, such as Yemeni Air Force, Gabon Air Force, Indonesian Air Force, and more. Ckfasdf (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is longer and has pictures. So against redirecting it there.  Also there are over a hundred articles like this. Category:Lists_of_military_aircraft.   D r e a m Focus  04:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This article is duplicate of Polish Air Force and Polish Land Forces and Wikipedia in general is against duplication articles. Regarding images on table, we have a consensus to not put aircraft image into the inventory table, and intentionally ignoring the consensus may be considered as disruptive editing. Ckfasdf (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You link to a discussion had in 2015, with 4 wanting to get rid of images like this, and 1 wanting to keep it. So 5 people decided something in a two week discussion most never noticed, 9 years ago.  I think a new discussion is warranted with greater participation, and not just about aircraft, but list of tanks, ships, and whatnot.   D r e a m Focus  08:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It's true that consensus can change per WP:CCC. However, until new consensus reached, it doesn't means we can disregard existing consensus. Ckfasdf (talk) 08:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The presence or absence of photos is irrelevant re AfD. put the "disruptive editing" cudgel away.  // Timothy :: talk  15:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. This topic is different the other ones and therefore, this isn't a WP:CFORK. It would correspond to other articles that Fabrice Ram cited, like List of active Russian military aircraft. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 23:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If we look up Russian Aerospace Forces, Russian Naval Aviation and Russian Ground Forces, we'll notice that none of them include aircraft inventory tables. Instead, all Russian military aircraft are listed in the article titled List of active Russian military aircraft, hence no duplication issue or not WP:REDUNDANTFORK. However, this differs from the approach taken in Polish military articles, where each branch has its own aircraft inventory table: Polish Air Force, Polish Land Forces and Polish Navy. These tables are duplicate information found in the List of Polish military aircraft. Ckfasdf (talk) 03:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: Content is well sourced, I can't see merging with parents due to size, community consensus accepts these military equipment lists generally meet notability requirements. I do think the duplicate lists in the individual branch articles should be removed and replaced with a hat pointing to the appropriate spot in this list, eg: rm Polish Air Force and replace with hatnote to List of Polish military aircraft.  // Timothy :: talk  07:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The existing parent articles (such as Polish Air Force, Polish Land Forces, and Polish Navy) already contain lists of military equipment. According to WP:SIZE, a WP:SPINOFF is warranted only if there are concerns about article size. However, the parent articles size are not excessively large, ranging from only 250-350kB. Therefore, there appears to be no necessity for a WP:SPLITLIST at this time. Ckfasdf (talk) 07:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Everything is not black and white, there are plenty of gray areas where an issue is either up to editorial discretion or community consensus. In this case their is a community consensus that these lists (Lists of military equipment) are generally notable, useful for readers, and having the information in one place is easier to keep updated. I see no reason to have this information split into multiple articles. The editors in this thread seem to agree.  // Timothy :: talk  15:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * While it's true that not everything is black and white, plenty of gray, and there are even times when rules can be ignored per WP:IAR, there must be a compelling reason to justify such exceptions, like bypassing WP:SIZE guidelines. While the List by itself is generally notable, the issue at hand involves potential duplication. If we look up other Air Forces pages, it's evident that out of 147 Air Force articles, 128 integrate the inventory table into the air forces article itself, while only 17 opt for separate presentation, including as a List. This indicates that the most common or preferred approach to displaying aircraft inventory table to readers is within the air force article itself. Ckfasdf (talk) 14:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: I don't see a consensus here yet. The nominator might have more success with a compelling Merger proposal rather than a strong demand to delete an article that other editors find appropriate. But without providing a new perspective, this discussion is verging on bludgeoning. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment Transclusion can be a solution if keeping material current is a concern. See List of active United States Air Force aircraft. Schierbecker (talk) 17:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is a very well phrased rationale; issues have been identified, alternatives have been considered, and deletion has been requested in accordance with our policies and guidelines. The only reason to keep would be to merge it properly by removing the texts from the 3 source pages and removing the images as demanded by Convention. NLeeuw (talk) 07:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to this list
 * (preferred) either just List of equipment of the Polish Land Forces (Polish Land Forces doesn't exist) and Polish Navy, since they're subsidiary elements of those branches, and have a hatnote pointing to Polish Air Force, or
 * all three to here. Clarityfiend (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned on the lead, if the list is only duplicate to either Polish Air Force, List of equipment of the Polish Land Forces, or Polish Navy, then I would suggest to merge/redirect to one of them per WP:MERGEREASON. But, they are three different list belong to different branch of armed forces. And 128 of 147 Air Force articles integrate the inventory table into the air forces article itself, which indicates the most common or preferred approach to displaying aircraft inventory table. Ckfasdf (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.