Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Power Rangers monsters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --Core desat  20:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

List of Power Rangers monsters

 * — (View AfD)

This article should be deleted, as each section in this article already has a separate article which explains each of the monsters in greater depth. JPG-GR 01:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article serves as a good "parent" article of the sub-lists. --- RockMFR 01:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd argue that Category:Lists_of_Power_Rangers_monsters already does that. JPG-GR 02:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * If someone wants to see all of the monsters at once, or is trying to find what list a specific monster is in, the large list is very useful. --- RockMFR 03:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per RockMFR. - Che Nuevara  02:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Useful collation of material that is not itself being questioned. Lists are useful for organization, and in this case, I can see how it might help someone. FrozenPurpleCube 03:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; it's a list of lists, each subsequent list is more detailed than this one.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 08:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Whilst excessive listing often seems to miss the point (or have no purpose at all), in this instance it looks like a good idea - someone looking for the series containing a particular monster can just hit ALT+F and find which series they're after. It's well organized, the potential uses are clear and the subject matter is certainly relevant for the encyclopedia - there's a glut of articles/lists that will never be any of those things which do need to be squashed by the AFD buttocks. QuagmireDog 09:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Bec-Thorn-Berry 11:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep — See no reason to delete (on a side note Go go Power Rangers!) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 17:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to list things like this. Please read what Wikipedia is NOT. /Blaxthos 17:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * What part of WP:NOT does this fall under?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 18:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pokemon Rule. -Toptomcat 17:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * While I appreciate that this is your opinion on the matter at hand, there is no "Pokemon rule."--Dmz5 01:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * He's referring to Pokémon test— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 02:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ref, I'm aware of the essay, but I am always wary of users who cite "rules" even if they don't mean it that way--Dmz5 04:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep what RockMFR first said. Plus 'someone looking for the series containing a particular monster can just hit ALT+F and find which series they're after. It's well organized, the potential uses are clear and the subject matter is certainly relevant for the encyclopedia ' this part of what QuagmireDog said. --Xiahou 02:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorize. Main category: Power Rangers monsters. Then sort into subcategories by show. --Hemlock Martinis 03:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * There are no articles for specific monsters. Just lists of them per season/series. There exists a category, of which several of the series-specific pages are kept in.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 04:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * If there aren't any articles for specific monsters, then that would make this list quite crufty. --Hemlock Martinis 04:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, lists like List of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers monsters (Season One) have indepth details. This AFD is for a list of the names, as well as links to the series specific lists.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 05:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.