Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Qassam rocket attacks, 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 09:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

List of Qassam rocket attacks, 2006

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not news, nor is it an archive for news items. Although, I have no doubt that some of the events may in fact be notable this article claims to be about all of them but, only serves to regurgitate items of news without any apparent attempt to be encylopedic on the subject. PROD tag removed by author without any attempt at explaination. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

And if I'm gonna nominate these two than in the spirit of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and lord know what else I need to nominate the following for the same reasons as well:

Additionally, although Qassam rockets and such may be notable enough the base article List of Qassam rocket attacks need to be reviewed. It should either be a list of notable events or an article about Qassam rocket attacks and at the moment it appears stuck half way in between to me. Thanks. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Jasynnash2 said most of what I was going to say. RockManQ  (talk) 15:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Eatabullet (talk) 23:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into a single list. If all the information is already there, delete. I do not think the entries too detailed, and a list of them is appropriate content, more than just temporary interest. DGG (talk) 03:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If a merge occurs than List of Qassam rocket attacks is probably the best place (but, as I pointed out that article is stuck somewhere between being a list and being an article).Jasynnash2 (talk) 07:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.