Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Quality, Fawcett and Charlton characters who haven't appeared in DC Comics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes   talk  02:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

List of Quality, Fawcett and Charlton characters who haven't appeared in DC Comics

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Overly detailed topic for fans, unsourced, and zero real-world consequence. Geschichte (talk) 19:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete- Unsurprisingly, this fails WP:LISTN. Surprisingly, this has somehow survived since 2005. Hog Farm Bacon 19:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:38, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:38, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:LISTN and does not meet any of the purposes described in WP:AOAL Spiderone  19:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Completely unsourced, and appears to be based on WP:OR. As there are no reliable sources discussing the concept, it completely fails WP:LISTN as well.  Rorshacma (talk) 01:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete- agree with reasons stated above. Rhino131 (talk) 13:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Coverage can be provided elsewhere if necessary. Tessaracter (talk) 05:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mein Gott. What's next, a list of Power Rangers and Pokemons who haven't appeared in Harry Potter franchise? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * List of Spiderman villains who have not appeared in a live action film, List of superheros who Disney owns the film rights to but have not appeared in an MCU film, List of known second age characters from the works of Tolkian who have not been portrayed in Amazon's Lord of the Ring's TV show, with sub-categories List of named Numenorians who have not appeared in the Lord of the Rings TV show, List of characters alive for some of the Lord of the Rings books and in the second age not having appeared in the Lord of the Rings TV show and on and on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:LISTN and WP:OR. desmay (talk) 10:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This is the worst list I have ever seen and that is saying something. It almost should go on a list of hilariously horrible article titles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That this article has existed for 15 years just tells me Wikipedia is broken.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The only way you could feasibly stumble upon this article is by clicking the 'random article' button on the left. Literally nobody is searching for this.... Spiderone  14:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I caught it while looking at backlinks to this deleted cat :) Also, yes there is such a list: WP:DAFT. Geschichte (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It gets a daily average of 4 views per day, so that's... something.  Dark knight  2149  09:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Pure trivia. The topic looks like it was curated by the article OP, rather than there being substantial third party coverage and evaluation over the subject of characters who, as of this moment, have yet to appear in a comic book published by DC.  Dark knight  2149  06:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete article fails the WP:GNG and WP:IINFO, due to a lack of sources and an arbitrary intersection of list criteria. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:31, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.