Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Radiohead B-sides


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

List of Radiohead B-sides

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable, ie, B-sides do not warrant page Tenacious D Fan (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as trivia, no reliable sources about the B-sides, and B-sides are rarely ever notable. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)
 * Delete per TPH. -- Jeandré, 2008-06-08t20:35z
 * Delete as per previous comments. However, over the years some B-sides have been known to become hit tunes. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * yes, that is true, but none of these did. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 14:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * 2+2=AfD Delete as fancruft. Would look better on a fansite, with more details of the songs.  On a related matter, was their cover of Nobody Does It Better ever released?  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:OR. Its all rather subjective article. Artene50 (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * In an interstella burst I am here to vote Delete. The B-sides already discussed in the seperate articles for each single. Its just a list where each title redirects to the single it appears as the B-side too, which makes it redundant to information elsewhere. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 14:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's well established that discographies are legitimate lists of works, and this is a legitimate subsidiary article of Radiohead discography per Summary style. It could possibly be merged into Radiohead discography, but that doesn't require an AFD. EALacey (talk) 21:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * B-sides aren't relevant in a discography anyway. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:NOT. A list of singles may be justified as part of a discography, but a list of B-sides certainly appears to fail. Seems like the sort of information that only die-hard fans would care about. The band is certainly notable, but there appears to be scant evidence as to the B-sides' notability. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a legitimate article and has no real reason for deletion I disagree strongly. Orangekubrick (talk) 00:26, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.