Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Raven challenges


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  12:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

List of Raven challenges

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

and this is notable... how? The series may be, but I was unable to find anything which would suggest a notable aspect of the series is these challenges. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 19:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs

Challenges are the biggest part of Raven, it is a very notable aspect of the series! And how can we source it except by saying that we've seen the programme? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.132.61 (talk) 20:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Thanks for letting me know on my talk page; I originally spun this article out from the main one on the show itself, as it was clogging up the main article body. The challenges as a whole are notable since they do actually make up most of the show, but you're probably right in the sense that a full and detailed list doesn't fall within Wikipedia's notability guidelines. SynergyBlades (talk) 20:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Well I think the article should stay. What's the harm in information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.132.61 (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete, too much information. Wikipedia is not a fan site. Stifle (talk) 23:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Sandstein   11:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and this is way too detailed and of limited interest. A brief summary of the challenges in the main article should suffice. Somno (talk) 00:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of relevance. 86.26.132.61, you'll have to come up with more than WP:ILIKEIT.
 * Delete Per above, and most of those images fail the NFCC...hard. Protonk (talk) 05:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

It's ridiculous that it's now been deleted!!! Why couldn't we just reduce the information rather than delete it!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.129.225 (talk) 20:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)