Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Red Dead Redemption Outfits


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 03:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

List of Red Dead Redemption Outfits

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:NOTGUIDE violation, see also WP:GAMETRIVIA. Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. Teancum (talk) 23:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the nominator and also cite WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:GAMECRUFT. the same policies.  Ubelowme U  Me  23:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete – This type of detailed gaming information will probably never satisfy WP:GNG. It may belong somewhere in Computer Game Walkthroughs (hint). Regards, RJH (talk) 01:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Might be better off transwikied in a Gaming Wikia -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This just isn't what Wikipedia is for. There's no notability here, at least not enough for it to require its own article.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - GAMECRUFT/TRIVIA guidelines are pretty clear about including this kind of stuff in articles at all, let alone having a whole article dedicated to it... Sergecross73   msg me   13:47, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. 19:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. 19:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I politely informed the new Wikipedia user where they could post this information if it wasn't already there. http://reddead.wikia.com/wiki/Outfits  Instead of just nominating things for deletion, and calling them "cruft", its best to explain things to people, and point them to where they can find a wiki that's right for them.   D r e a m Focus  20:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Clarification - For starters, it's a copy/paste from the Red Dead Wiki. I had already informed the user in the edit history when I PRODed the article, and the creator responded in a way that seemed he/she understood. I don't just drop the "cruft" tag, and also don't appreciate the accusation. --Teancum (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Your nomination was fine. I should've said "instead of just saying delete and calling things cruft"... that is rude for a new user to have to endure.  Its best to explain things properly on the talk page of the new user as I did. User_talk:The_conspiracy_theory   D r e a m Focus  01:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: Spurious fancruft p  b  p  17:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.