Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Red Light Cameras in Toronto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Mets501 (talk) 03:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

List of Red Light Cameras in Toronto
It's exactly what the title suggests; it's about intersection traffic cameras, which are found in pretty much every North American city with more than a couple thousand people. I consider myself an inclusionist, but this is far beyond "roadcruft", and may have been intended as a bad joke. Read it if you don't believe me. — CharlotteWebb 06:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This wouldn't even come close to passing WP:N. --Адам12901 Talk 06:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOT a collection of indiscriminate information. Really. C'mon. Please? Pretty please? &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 06:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an encyclopedia. --- RockMFR 08:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:WTH. MER-C 08:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to WP:BJAODN. This is about as indiscriminate as it can possibly get. Ohconfucius 08:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:N, collection of indis. info., perchance someone got a ticket and wanted to publicize all of those nasty cameras, eh? ;)
 * Delete and WP:DAFT. Grutness...wha?  11:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete what Wikipedia isn't about. Budgiekiller 13:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT a directory, an indiscriminate collection of information, wrong place if you want to post such information. Terence Ong 15:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't police forces move the red light cameras around every few weeks anyway? WP:DAFT. Editing because (to my surprise) there really is a WP:WTF. -- Charlene 16:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Impossible to keep up-to-date, and way too specific for any possible use as research. 23skidoo 16:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, indiscriminate information at its finest. -- Kinu t /c  19:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is not indiscriminate info. This is useful info on a local level as per WP:LOCAL. Who does it hurt having this article? Furthermore, it useful to see where the provincial government has implemented such an important program. Nlsanand 22:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: what next? post boxes and telephone booths??? Please give us a break! Ohconfucius 03:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete "not a collection of indiscriminate information". Hmm... but if I ever have to drive around Toronto, I just might make a quick stop at DRV first :-) LOL, j/k... (Off topic, but do they really move around red light cameras in Canada every few weeks, or just the speed cameras?) Quack 688 09:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useful information to be sure.  Probably something that somebody might search for on the web.  But Wikipedia isn't the place for it. Dragomiloff 01:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.