Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Redeemer University College faculty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Redeemer University College. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

List of Redeemer University College faculty

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This is not a viable list under WP:LISTPEOPLE. WP:GNG certainly is not met by coverage of the topic currently, as presented in third-party reliable sources. The topic is not substantially different from Redeemer University College, and no members appear to be actually notable. Also, this list is outdated and virtually entirely unsupported. JFHJr (㊟) 21:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like it would only be useful for those attending the university and they would use their university's website anyways.  Morgan Kevin J (talk) 22:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No referencing has been provided and very few of the faculty members appear to be noteworthy. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 22:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 01:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 01:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 01:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Redeemer University College article after purging non-notable entries. If "very few" faculty are noteworthy, that's still > zero, and these should be listed in the school's parent article, to be split off only if size dictates. There may also be some basis for listing in that school's article those faculty who are (verifiably) significant to the school's history (if any) even though they might not merit their own articles (though that could also just be integrated into the history section). If the end result is that the only faculty worth mentioning from this list are already named in Redeemer University College, then just redirect to Redeemer University College. postdlf (talk) 04:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Could we purge the red and non-links from this page and make it the beginning of a List of Redeemer University College people? Maybe it's a bit young for notable alumni, but eventually we're likely to have one. --BDD (talk) 16:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge back - not a notable list; defined as including NN academics; can be re-created later but is not yet ready per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 20:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge. Merge back to university page.--Eric Yurken (talk) 19:59, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment — Given the improbability of this title being typed into a search or directly into the address, what would a redirect/merge be good for, practically speaking? The history is also about as valuable as the title... JFHJr (㊟) 21:10, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.