Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Reformed Theological Seminary people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. No support for deletion. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 22:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

List of Reformed Theological Seminary people

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No citations since May 2023, and not clear that this will be notable enough by itself, could consider merge into the main article OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 10:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Christianity. Shellwood (talk) 10:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve: This list is lengthy enough that it would make the main article unwieldy, and it corresponds to Wikipedia treatment for similarly lengthy lists from other religious institutions of tertiary education. (See List of General Theological Seminary people, List of Virginia Theological Seminary people, List of Columbia Theological Seminary people, List of Fuller Theological Seminary people, List of Westminster Theological Seminary people, List of St. John's Seminary (California) people, List of New Brunswick Theological Seminary people.) I'm willing to work on adding citations, but per WP:IMPROVEDONTREMOVE, let's keep and allow time for improvements (unless editorial consensus is also to delete/merge the other list pages cited above, but they have not been nominated). Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: If the article gets more citations, I feel like it could be important enough to merit its own article. It could use a bit of polishing, but the article itself has its place here. ❤History  Theorist❤  06:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per Dclemens1971. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep List articles are (like categories) largely a means of navigation. As such they do not need references: the references will appear in the listed articles.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.