Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Registered Historic Places in Kansas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was non-admin close; nom withdrawn, see below TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 01:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

List of Registered Historic Places in Kansas

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Mostly red-linked list. Hellno2 (talk) 22:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

The result was withdrawn by nominator. The unanimous concensus is to keep. Hellno2 (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC) (non-admin close)


 * Keep No different than most of the other lists at Category:Lists of Registered Historic Places by state, red links aside. Most of the red links can be fixed, given that registered historic places are pretty much inherently notable. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep WikiProject National Register of Historic Places maintains a list of registered historic places for every U.S. state. These lists are constantly being updated as new places are added to the National Park Service list. As User:TenPoundHammer states, the fact that these places are on the NPS list makes them notable. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 23:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep As previously said, the places are notable by being on the National Register, so a list of notable places shouldn't be deleted. Creating articles to remove the redlinks is an ongoing process for all the lists, considering the tens of thousands of sites on the Register. -Ebyabe (talk) 23:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep registered historic places are notable and therefore a list is useful for redlink development and entirely approrpiate use of a list TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 23:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep The lists are the complete listing of the Historic Sites for each state. Every name on the list is notable and will eventually have an article. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 23:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep FYI, the NRHP places are notable for wikipedia because a) the places have been deemed of historical importance, and b) there is plenty of documentation (verifiability) about each one, specifically for each one there is a NRHP inventory/nomination document available. doncram (talk) 00:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.