Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Revelation Space races


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

List of Revelation Space races

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article deleted via WP:PROD, undeleted as a contested PROD at WP:RFUD by me. But, I agree 100% this should be deleted. PROD nominator says this fails WP:LISTN. I say it also fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE as it is a summary-only description of works. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete As basic failure of WP:LISTN. List of Revelation Space characters also fails LISTN and you should consider nominating that too.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , agreed. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pure WP:FANCRUFT that belongs on Wikia, not here (fails WP:NFICTION). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the exact same reasons already given that I don't feel the need to repeat. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete- per all above. This is badly sourced fancruft, written in an in-universe plot summary style. Reyk YO! 07:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete All of the above, plus its not even referenced and reads as original works, all no nos. User:Davidstewartharvey
 * Delete - as has repeatedly been noted, this is fancruft with no sourcing outside the works themselves and no evidence of notability even within fandom, far less any substantial coverage of this (frankly) comparatively obscure series. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  07:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Java Hurricane  16:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:FANCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 09:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - As non-notable fancruft. Even if there were the slightest indication of notability, the article would need to be blown up and started over... --Jack Frost (talk) 05:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Comprehensive failure of WP:LISTN. I don't see the reason for contesting the PROD in the article history, but I don't see a way this article could ever be made policy compliant, as policy is now interpreted. Hog Farm (talk) 15:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.