Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rihanna concert tours


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure)  Jay Jay What did I do? 01:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

List of Rihanna concert tours

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NMUSIC and WP:NCONCERT this is not necessary as its a summary of concern tours which all have their own page with their own significant coverage. Details on opening acts and set lists are already contained on the tours' pages and as a search term it seems highly unlikely someone would come to wikipedia and search "List of Rihanna concert tours". Its more likely someone would go to the artist's page and click on the tours section where it lists each of the tours. Each of the tours is already mentioned on the artist's page and so I don't understand how anyone would actually end up on this page. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I find this kind of boilerplate nomination really poor practice when the particular lists vary widely in substance and development, as these concert lists you've nominated do. This list clearly has far more information than the bare list of concerts in the main Rihanna article, and it is standard practice to index a group of articles together per WP:LISTPURP, so it is not a good deletion argument to say this information is found in each individual concert tour article. So keep. postdlf (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SAL; a navigational index of notable topics. The article is too large to fit into the main article, and a link is posted there. It does not matter how useful or visible it is, it is if it is warranted rather. Another difference is this article places the items in list-form, which is handy, but not absolute. As noted before, the main Rihanna article contains far less, detailed information on the subject. TBrandley (what's up) 18:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It satisfies policy as a navigational index. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a notable list. There are hundreds of these types of articles. She's had enough tours to warrant a stand-alone article. — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 21:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see no reason to delete. A reader might get here by going to the Rihanna article, navigating to the Tours section, seeing that there is a link to a more detailed article, and clicking on it. QED. --Michig (talk) 21:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NMUSIC and WP:NCONCERT are not applicable to lists. — ΛΧΣ  21  21:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a notable list and there's no reason to delete. VítoR™   &bull;&#32;  (D)  02:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - She has had enough tours. AARON &bull; TALK   15:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.