Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rihanna tours


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 00:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

List of Rihanna tours

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A list of Rihanna's tours is not required. She has only had four tours and the information listed is trivial. It is also sourced from other wikipedia pages which is not appropriate. -- (Lil_℧niquℇ №1)  &#124;  (talk)  17:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Rihanna's tour page is not going to be on the level of the List_of_Beyoncé_Knowles_concert_tours page any time soon!--mikomango (talk) 20:02, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - I think all it needs is some expansion, which really wouldn't take that long to do. I don't think this should be deleted. Maybe re-direct to her main article. I will try to fix it up a little bit though. ΣПDiПG – STΛЯT  20:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This "list" appears to only sum up the information contained within the tour articles. I see it more of a navigational page than a list of tours.  The tours can easily be accessible from the Rihanna template.  ~ [  Scott M. Howard  ] ~ [  Talk  ]:[  Contribs  ] ~  23:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, WP:WEDONTNEEDIT is not a good argument. This collects and formats a list of articles with supplemental details, fleshed out with some non-notable performances that wouldn't merit their own articles and so the info has no other place to go.  It's too lengthy to be merged back into Rihanna.  As for whether the navigational template is sufficient, this list has many more tours listed (such as ones in which she was not the main act, apparently) and plenty more information that the template's bare article links does not.  As WP:CLN explains, one format does not preclude others, particularly where the other format has benefits particular to it, as here.  postdlf (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * KeepJagoperson (talk) 12:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Contrary to apparent nom implication, Rihanna doesn't seem to be going away, article will grow further over time. Wasted Time R (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.