Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of RiverClan cats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Userfy. If someone needs help userfying contact me — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

List of RiverClan cats

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Per Articles for deletion/List of ThunderClan cats; these articles are purely in-universe plot reiteration referenced exclusively to primary sources (the books). There is no realistic possibility of any of these being edited into a form which would alter that. There is a warriors which is ultimately a much better host for this sort of content; comments on the previous AfD suggest at least some of this content has already been transwikied there. As a followup, list of Warriors characters should be trimmed to only major characters in the series. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 15:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 15:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 15:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per precedent. --BDD (talk) 16:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and userfy Userfy to my userspace, please. And the term "major characters" is going to need to be defined more clearly soon.  Bramble  claw  x   18:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, but... with an option to transwiki and/or selectively merge the important ones back into list of Warriors characters, which itself looks to have some problems. I'm a big fan of character lists for fiction and always have been, but this number and detail is excessive and it's extremely unlikely substantial coverage in reliable sources exist for, say, "Dapplenose" or "Grasskit".  Simply put, this is something for a fansite, not an encyclopedia. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and Userfy all since a primary content area editor has boldly accepted the nominator's suggestion above. I agree this material does belong on a fan site, which is why Wikia runs such content spaces. User:Brambleclawx is an experienced editor and has offered to do the work to improve this. No real argument here. Win and win. After userfication, I suggest redirecting all to List of Warriors characters. BusterD (talk) 03:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.