Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rolling Stone Top 200 number-one albums of 2019


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

List of Rolling Stone Top 200 number-one albums of 2019

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

See also Articles for deletion/List of Rolling Stone Top 200 number-one albums of 2020. Per this discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts, the Rolling Stone chart has been deemed a WP:BADCHART due to faulty methodology. Since that chart has been deemed unreliable, this article becomes a copy of magazine trivia, and a non-notable topic. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete There's no evidence that Rolling Stone charts have become viable or are considered authoritative to any degree in the music industry. The methodology just isn't there and I don't think there's been major coverage of this as any sort of standard. Toa Nidhiki05 17:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable: a google book search turned up an old "Rolling Stone's Top 200 All-Time Rock Albums" list, but nothing about the album chart. —Ojorojo (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per my comment on the similar AFD and the consensus on WP:CHART that this chart cannot be used in Wikipedia album articles. Bluesatellite (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Of no use now that the chart is a deprecated chart. AshMusique (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.