Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Roman Catholic dioceses in Bangladesh by name


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Catholic dioceses in Bangladesh. In light of the comments here about the eventual name, this will probably need a page title discussion after the merge Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

List of Roman Catholic dioceses in Bangladesh by name

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Duplicvates List of Catholic dioceses in Bangladesh Laurel Lodged (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  94rain  Talk 09:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * List of Catholic dioceses in Bangladesh has less information than this one. I say delete the other one and rename this one.   D r e a m Focus  12:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy merge/redirect/whatever Seems pretty uncontroversial that these are the same, just do it. Reywas92Talk 19:06, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Catholic dioceses in Bangladesh. Dates and whatnot should be transferred over. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment "Roman" is sometimes used to refer exclusively to the Latin Rite whereas Catholic on its own encompasses both the Latin Rite and the 23 other sui juris churches in communion with the Holy See so I would say that "Catholic" is preferable. Laurel Lodged (talk) 19:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge the two articles under the other name. Use the content of this article, but the arrangement of the other.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.