Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Royal Air Force aircraft wings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

List of Royal Air Force aircraft wings
Non-notable list; aprox 300 entries with only 1 working internal link (all the rest are redlinks). Argon233&ensp;  T &ensp; C  @ &ensp; &notin; &ensp; 04:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Definitely a nn list. While we're at it, I'm gonna tag the working internal link, nothing notable there either.  Darquis 04:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - It was only created 11 days ago. Could we give it a chance to become notable? It could be worthwhile. - Richardcavell 06:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It was created on 2004-09-11 &mdash; 2 years and 11 days ago. Kimchi.sg 08:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The proper course of action, as I understand it, should have been to build it in user space so it was up to standard. Of course, this being a list of links, that may never have happened.  Perhaps if some of the individual wings had pages that met Wiki standards, some sort of category or list might be in order. Darquis 07:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete Definitely nn. Listcruft. --Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  ) '' 00:42, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft. Kimchi.sg 08:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. -- JJay 11:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep one of the explicit purposes of lists is to show up redlinks to articles that need creating. Added to which, the list is in and of itself interesting. 88.107.217.217 23:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Start at the Royal Air Force article, if such article becomes too big continue in an explained list, and if such list becomes too big, just then make a separate article per every wing. -- ReyBrujo 16:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.