Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Royal Air Force operational conversion units


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ask?  19:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

List of Royal Air Force operational conversion units
Non-notable list; aprox 15 entries, with all of the being redlinks. Argon233&ensp;  T &ensp; C  @ &ensp; &notin; &ensp; 05:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Clean Up Explanations and expansions would help here, it must be of some notability with its relation to the RAF... doktorb | words 08:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia shouldn't be a repository of links to articles that don't exist. Darquis 08:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Commment No, but Wiki could be really helped if red links become blue by articles being created...doktorb | words 10:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment If they're good, verified articles on notable subjects, I agree. The list doesn't have to exist for that to happen though. Darquis 21:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Convert into deleted article. Kimchi.sg 08:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, start at Royal Air Force to see if the common contributors to that article think this is worth. -- ReyBrujo 16:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm doing a lot of work on the Royal Air Force and associated articles, and I can't see us ever having articles on each of these conversion units, none of which even exist any more anyway.  Sc147 20:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment We should make a superset of these lists, called List of Lists of RAF-related stuff. M1ss1ontomars2k4 02:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.