Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Royal Air Force operational training units


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

List of Royal Air Force operational training units
Non-notable list; aprox 110 entries, with only 1 working internal link (all of the rest are redlinks). Argon233&ensp;  T &ensp; C  @ &ensp; &notin; &ensp; 05:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Give it a chance to improve. - Richardcavell 06:28, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's had two years; that seems like an adequate chance. ergot 17:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The right course here would be to build up articles for individual items on the list before even trying the list (I'm not sure if it would ever be appropriate) Darquis
 * Delete, expansion should start at Royal Air Force before splitting into extensive lists. Kimchi.sg 08:38, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. -- JJay 11:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If there were articles on many of the units, then keep, but I don't think there ever will be. Maybe if they appear, then create the list again, but until then... -- Con  D  e  m Talk 13:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kimchi. Start at the Royal Air Force article and if the normal contributors to that article don't delete that, once it grows enough it can be converted into a list with contents included in the list, but only create individual articles once such list grows extremely big. -- ReyBrujo 16:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Kimchi, ConDem, and ReyBrujo. No improvement after two years, it probably isn't going anywhere interesting.  ergot 17:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: It should not be deleted but moved to Royal Air Force Operational Training Units, content added and the list included, with wikilinks removed till content is created for them. I just found the article while expanding the details on RAF Hibaldstow in Hibaldstow. I am no expert but I am willing to elevate it to a worthy stub if article is moved and kept. --Asterion talk to me 15:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. With no internal or external links, there's really no content in the article. -- Kicking222 15:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.