Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Seinfeld girlfriends


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

List of Seinfeld girlfriends

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - the notability of the show does not make every subset of characters from the show notable. Otto4711 01:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Seinfeld has entered popular culture in so many ways. JJL 01:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Seinfeld's (and the other main characters') dating is one of the major theme of the series.--victor falk 02:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Then it should be discussed in an article about Seinfeld themes. That it may be a theme doesn't mean that a list of women he dated is notable. Otto4711 02:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This a list, ie a navigational aid, it helps readers finding episodes with that notable theme. --victor falk 02:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, satisfies WP:LIST purposes by being well-organized. Could use a few more sources establishing the notability of the theme and the idea that this launched or furthered more than one actress's career. --Dhartung | Talk 03:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * So you're saying any and all lists of any and all things that any and all people can think of, should be kept if they're well-organized? Corvus cornix 18:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As far as I can tell, the root topic (Seinfeld's girlfriends) is not notable.  By extension, this list is also not notable.  -Chunky Rice 20:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, the only source doesn't appear to be reliable under the definition at WP:RS, therefore this is basically unsourced trivia. Corvus cornix 21:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless someone creates a list of Seinfeld shirt colours, and Seinfeld Kitchen cabinets and Seinfeld snacks. Because that will make it alright. Operating 19:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Mainly per Chunky Rice's argument about how the root topic is not notable on its own. Dannycali 01:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per victor falk and Dhartung --Joelster 00:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete — not notable and not an encyclopaedic subject. Merge the external link to somewhere and leave it at that. --Jack Merridew 11:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Eusebeus 12:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dhartung as article seems to satisfy our standards. Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 17:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * What standards are those? Corvus cornix 18:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just because the show is notable, doesn't make every aspect of it notable for inclusion. This is fancruft, and trivial information at best. RobJ1981 22:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It may be nicely put together with specific episode references, but that alone doesn't make the subject notable. • 97198  talk  14:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unencyclopedic and rather trivial. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 15:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.