Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Selby characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Selby books.  MBisanz  talk 04:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

List of Selby characters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG. A google search brings up no discussions of subject. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Adpete (talk) 01:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge into List of Selby books. Comment whatever the outcome, it should be the same for List of Selby places and Template:Selby. i.e. either it all gets merged into List of Selby books, or it stays as a 3 separate articles and a Template. I prefer the former, to avoid duplication and fluff. Duncan Ball is a notable children's author so I don't think the material should be deleted. Adpete (talk) 02:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Further comment - a lot of the article should probably deleted anyway because it's unreferenced (though at least one potential reference exists: ). But even if we could reference it all, I still think one "Selby" article is what we need. Adpete (talk) 04:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, thanks for editor comments, agree that author is notable but not sure about merging to List of Selby books (LOSB) as it may not be notable either - it does not have any references (I've done a brief search, and have not found any refs discussing the books as a whole.) The majority of the author article is a list of his works, I was thinking of suggesting that info from LOSB be merged there after this afd is done. Coolabahapple (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  16:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE: non-notable list topic; fails WP:GNG and WP:LISTPURP. Esquivalience t 19:31, 27 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.